Saturday, 19 December 2015

Paul Rand Case Study.


Paul Rand was both an American art director and Graphic Designer who is primarily known for taking the creative industry by storm with his corporate logo designs.

Born in Brooklyn in 1914 it is remarked that Rand was an incredibly creative being from a young age, partaking in many creative deeds as a daily hobby and always perceived as practicing and furthering his talent and skill. His very first taste of working in the design field of work came when he was tasked with painting the signs for his father's grocery store and for school events - minor projects which lead to a big impact on his creative future.

It was at Pratt Institute in Manhattan that Rand studied art until being offered one of his first 'official' jobs: laying out product spreads for Apparel Arts (a popular men's fashion magazine owned by Esquire). This particular job later led to him designing magazine covers where he was naturally noticed for his particular flare in design work. By his early 20's Rand grew to be considered one of the most important designers of his generation.

One distinct detail which is interesting to acknowledge with regards to Rand and his work is the perception that he was ultimately one of the first American commercial artists to look to Europe for inspiration and not only embrace but physically practice the Swiss style of graphic design. This particular element of inspiration which began to become more present within his work initially began when Rand was a student and he developed a specific intrigue with commercial art journals from both Britain and Germany (which often featured innovative pieces by graphic designers such as A.M Cassandre). and it was observed that he also became an avid fan of the Swiss expressionist Paul Klee.With these fresh, new influences Rand lapped up the likes of Swiss typographic theory and Bahaus modernist thinking (on form and function) and began to reflect them within his own evolving design work which was beginning to use and combine collage, montage, hand-lettering, drawing and even photography.

At the time Rand was truly beginning his creative career it is often perceived that American advertising was at a stand still and very much still stuck in the 19th century - especially with regards to how the advertisements themselves were printed and produced. To put it bluntly: Creativity was lacking. That was, at least, until Rand was named chief art director of the newly formed advertising agency William H. Weintraub & Co. in 1941 at the age of just 27. Undeniably Rand had a vastly different approach to the job itself and brought the striking graphic work of Europe to his very own page designs - deeming that an advertisement's effectiveness relied on how the visual and the text aspects reacted on the canvas and merged together as one. It was during this period of his work in which he introduced an essential new ingredient into commercial art: form. And above all, his advertisements in particular were always bold, witty, and full of character. Rand was bringing the act of art into advertisement.

It cannot be denied that Rand aided a vital shift in creative power (from copywriters to art directors) across the industry. He laid the ground work for the 'Creative Revolution' of the 1960's and brought fresh ideas and outlooks to advertisement that no other creative worker thought to seek out.

1947 saw the arrival of Rand's first published book: Thoughts on Design, which continues to be influential even in contemporary times as it breaches the relationship between the visual appearance of something and it's physical use. Rand's argument was that a good piece of commercial art had be not only be beautiful but persuasive - an interesting concept within itself.

Onwards from here Rand's reputation continued to flourish at a steady pace and his past experiences considered mere fuel for the upcoming (big) phase of his career. Mid 1950's witnessed American corporations begin to somewhat take notice of their European counterparts (much like Rand had long ago as a student) but instead of feeling inspiration and motivation they were burdened with envy over the varying branding styles and became more competitive in the market. Thomas Jr. of IBM was noted as envious towards the ostentatious Italian typewriter company: Olivetti, and in an attempt to better his own company Watson hired Elliot Nayes (a designer and curator for the Museum of Modern Art) to help his cause. Nayes first port of call was, in turn, to hire Rand.

It's safe to say that Rand's influence at IBM was both slow and gradual. Not only did he have to create a design system for the company but also convince the designers (at its many outposts) to ultimately abide by it. He even worked on packaging, showrooms and interiors for the company's offices in an attempt to make it more personable as a whole. Rand's most permanent bestowal on IBM came in 1962 when he revealed the company logo is actually still in use today and was, in fact, a design he had battled with for years.


                        

The horizontal stripes of the final design were perceived to have solved two problems: from an aesthetic standpoint that united the letters as one and altered the company name to both look and feel lighter, taking away from the previous monolithic feel - all of which stack to become useful aspects for a business company logo which can be regarded as quite heavy and dull to begin with.

After this design battle had been undoubtedly won more jobs followed suit and Rand created identities and logos for the likes of UPS, ABC and Westing House - his work for these companies allowing people (and businesses) to see the value of consistent branding and identity and ultimately make it a more prominent aspect in future corporations, thus showing just how massive Rand's impact was on the creative industry and design itself, earning him a deserved status as a 'master of the trade.'

SOURCES:

  1. http://www.wired.com/2015/04/paul-rand-visionary-showed-us-design-matters/
  2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Rand

Case Studies.

What is a case study?
  • 'a process or record of research into the development of a particular person, group, or situation over a period of time.'
  • 'a particular instance of something used or analysed in order to illustrate a thesis or principle.'
                                                                                                                             - Google definition.
Case studies are an important form of research as they allow a certain amount of depth to be gathered around a specific person or subject. This intense gathering of information is a way to gain a profound amount of specific detail and allows the subject under scrutiny to give ideas, inspiration or even motivation to the researcher - especially in creative subjects.

The only downside to performing a case study is that there is no room for generalization. Due to the fact that each individual and/or subject is different, taking its own distinct route, a single general idea cannot be placed upon it. This means that the research can only reflect the specific person or subject alone.

As a creative worker it is important for my own personal gain and perspective to research and acknowledge the differences, similarities and individual routes each personally inspiring creative worker has experienced over the course of their careers in order to understand and further my own potential success in the industry. 

Wednesday, 9 December 2015

Copyright in Professional Delivery.

What is copyright?

  • Copyright is 'the exclusive and assignable legal right, given to the originator for a fixed number of years, to print, publish, perform, film, or record literary, artistic, or musical material.'
                                                                                                                             - Google definition.
The copyright law was first authorized by Charles II in 1662, during the time of the printing press when the production of books and newspapers allowed them to be easily reproduced and/or copied. This particular law prevents any form of original content from being taken and reproduced under the name of anyone who is not the original creator. It is an essential aspect of a creative workers life.

The law itself is an automatic right, however the license should be in writing which allows you to set out the use of your work and any restrictions. It is also possibly to grant licenses for different uses - meaning you can set different rules and restrictions on different pieces of work.

Owning copyright of your work ensures that you are the only person who has the right to make copies of your work, however if you are an employee under and agency it's important to acknowledge that they own copyright over you.

The intellectual property rights placed onto any original content last for the lifetime of the creator plus 70 years afterwards. Once these 70 years have surpassed the rights of the work are then open to the public and can be reclaimed by a separate company or person. An example of this is the company of  Whittards, which recently claimed the rights to the well known Alice in Wonderland illustrations by John Tenniel upon the surpassing of the 70th anniversary of his passing. The illustrations have even been reproduced under Whittards name and it's particular acts such as these that cause reason for debate over certain copyright laws - as although it's a rather reassuring factor that your work is protected for so many years even after death it could be considered unfair that original pieces can so easily be reclaimed and reproduced by anyone but the original creator after 70 years.

It is also possible for intellectual property to be bought, sold and licensed to others, giving a different person the rights to your work.


Elements which Copyright protects your work against:
  • The copying of work
  • Distribution of work (free or otherwise)
  • Making an adaption of an original piece (some artists will allow this IF and ONLY IF you provide appropriate credit and reference to the original piece)
  • Displaying of work on public premises or on the internet
Exceptions to copyright:
  • Private research and study
  • Private review
  • Library use
  • Parody, homage, caricature and pastiche
When is copyright infringed?

Copyright is infringed when another person carries out one of the copyright owner's exclusive rights without their permission. An exception to copyright does not apply. In the event of this happening the original owner's often take the next step of contacting the person in question who has disregarded the license over their work - these confrontations are often uncomfortable but necessary as the issue is usually resolved during this period. This is usually because the threat of court action is unwanted under the issue of time, energy and cost, meaning it's never particularly a wanted route during copyright infringement and often simpler to just approach the problem head on and give opposition the opportunity to make it right on your own terms rather than through court.

An important aspect to always consider with copyright is that you cannot physically own an idea, only its expression or documentation. If somebody acts upon your idea before you and you have no physical evidence of it being your creation (e.g having already created the piece) then there are no copyright laws placed over it and you cannot take action against this